THE OUTSIDER AND ABSOLUTE EVIL: MORAL AMBIGUITY IN THE VOID


I. THE ABBEY'S PERSPECTIVE: THE OUTSIDER AS COSMIC EVIL

[From Abbey of the Everyman doctrine & texts]:

  • Official Dogma: The Abbey unequivocally portrays The Outsider as the ultimate manifestation of evil:

    • "The Outsider is the source of all corruption and chaos"
    • "He is the Void given form, seeking only to undermine the natural order"
    • "His gifts are poison, his attention is death"
    • "Any who seek him are damned, any who speak to him are lost"
  • Theological Framing: The Abbey's doctrine establishes a clear binary:

    • The Cosmic Order (good, predictable, safe) vs. The Void (evil, chaotic, dangerous)
    • The Abbey's Seven Strictures vs. The Outsider's temptations
    • Human virtue vs. Void corruption

[From Overseer sermons & pronouncements]:

  • "The black-eyed Outsider is wickedness embodied, waiting for moments of weakness"
  • "Let no one doubt: the world's misfortunes spring from his twisted hand"
  • "The Abbey stands as the bulwark against his absolute evil, our only protection from the Void's hunger"

II. EVIDENCE AGAINST ABSOLUTE EVIL: THE OUTSIDER'S NEUTRALITY

[From The Outsider's own statements]:

  • Explicit Neutrality: The Outsider repeatedly states his position as an observer, not director:

    • "I don't choose sides, I'm just here to offer a little help to those who interest me"
    • "How you use what I have given you falls upon you, as it has to the others before you"
    • "Some call me demon, others call me savior. I am neither."
  • Passive Role: He emphasizes his non-intervention in outcomes:

    • "I will be watching with great interest"
    • "I never provide the purpose, only the means"
    • "I don't influence the outcome, only offer possibilities"

[From gameplay mechanics & narrative structure]:

  • Player Autonomy: The game systems support this neutrality:
    • Powers can be used for both lethal and non-lethal approaches
    • The Outsider acknowledges both high and low chaos choices without judgment
    • He provides tools but never directs their use

III. EVIDENCE SUGGESTING EVIL: QUESTIONABLE PATTERNS

[From pattern analysis across games]:

  • Selection Criteria: The Outsider predominantly chooses individuals:

    • At moments of personal crisis or trauma
    • With potential for significant violence
    • In positions to destabilize power structures
    • His selections often precede periods of social collapse
  • Power Dynamics: His powers often:

    • Enable violence and assassination
    • Disrupt established order
    • Create supernatural threats to ordinary people
    • Derive from morally questionable sources (whale suffering, death)

[From environmental storytelling & consequences]:

  • The proliferation of shrines in areas with plague, poverty, and bloodshed
  • The correlation between Void influence and environmental destruction
  • The tendency for his Marked ones to leave trails of chaos regardless of intention
  • The psychological deterioration of many who interact with Void powers

IV. THE TRAUMATIZED GOD: ORIGIN CONTEXT

[From Death of the Outsider revelations]:

  • Victim Not Villain: The Outsider's origin reveals him as:

    • A traumatized child victim
    • Unwillingly transformed
    • Bound to the Void against his will
    • Not the creator of the Void but its prisoner
  • Context for Behavior: This context reframes his actions:

    • Detachment as a trauma response
    • Interest in choice stemming from his own stolen agency
    • Fascination with power dynamics after being powerless
    • Ambiguity as a result of his own violated boundaries

[From Billie's visions & dialogue]:

  • Billie recognizes: "The cultists made him what he is. He didn't choose this."
  • The Eyeless cultist states: "We created the Outsider himself... and now he sleeps in the ritual hold, held in the crushing grip of the Void itself."
  • The Outsider himself: "The name I had when I was fifteen is lost to time."

V. AMORALITY VS. IMMORALITY: PHILOSOPHICAL DISTINCTION

[From philosophical analysis of dialogue & actions]:

  • Amoral Observer: Evidence suggests The Outsider is amoral rather than immoral:

    • Shows no pleasure in suffering
    • Doesn't promote or reward cruelty for its own sake
    • Appears genuinely curious about moral choices
    • Comments on both mercy and violence with similar interest
  • Key Distinction: The difference between:

    • Immorality - deliberately choosing evil (not evident in his actions)
    • Amorality - operating outside moral frameworks (consistent with his behavior)
    • This distinction is central to evaluating his nature

[From The Outsider's commentary on events]:

  • Shows interest in both redemption and vengeance
  • Comments on kindness with the same curiosity as cruelty
  • Often poses questions rather than making judgments: "Will you tear it all to pieces? Either way, it's Lady Boyle's last party."

VI. THE VOID ITSELF: SEPARATING ENTITY FROM ENERGY

[From The Void Wiki & lore documents]:

  • The Void's Nature: Sources suggest The Void itself is:

    • "An emptiness that hungers"
    • Existing before The Outsider
    • Continuing after him
    • A natural force rather than a moral entity
  • Important Separation: Distinguishing between:

    • The Void as a natural cosmic force (like gravity)
    • The Outsider as its conscious avatar
    • Void energy as a neutral power source
    • The uses humans choose for that energy

[From Death of the Outsider ending]:

  • "The Outsider is no more... the world will change in ways none of us can know, but the Void is still there, echoing just beyond what you can see."
  • This confirms The Void's independent existence from The Outsider

VII. COMPARATIVE MORALITY: THE OUTSIDER VS. HUMAN INSTITUTIONS

[From comparative analysis of faction actions]:

  • Abbey's Actions: The institution claiming to fight "absolute evil":

    • Tortures suspected heretics
    • Kidnaps children for indoctrination
    • Executes dissidents
    • Enforces conformity through violence
  • Empire's Actions: The "civilized" power structure:

    • Exploits poor through harsh labor
    • Decimates whale populations
    • Creates vast wealth inequality
    • Responds to plague with brutality
  • The Outsider's Actions:

    • Grants power to selected individuals
    • Observes outcomes
    • Makes cryptic comments
    • Does not directly harm anyone

[From thematic analysis]:

  • This comparison suggests human institutions often commit greater evils than The Outsider himself
  • The true moral question becomes whether enabling others' choices constitutes moral responsibility

VIII. THE MORAL TEST: CHOICE AS ETHICAL EXAMINATION

[From narrative structure analysis]:

  • The Central Theme: The Outsider's powers function as a moral magnifier:

    • They reveal character rather than change it
    • They amplify existing tendencies
    • They create situations of moral choice
    • They test the limits of self-restraint
  • Different Responses: Compare how different characters use the same powers:

    • Daud: For assassination, then redemption
    • Granny Rags: For revenge and descent into madness
    • Delilah: For power and domination
    • Corvo/Emily: For either mercy or vengeance (player's choice)

[From The Outsider's statements about Marked individuals]:

  • "I've seen my Mark used for power, for love, for money, for strange obsessions that drove the wearer mad, but very rarely for redemption."
  • This suggests he finds the variety of responses interesting precisely because they reveal moral character

IX. DEVELOPER INTENT: THE DESIGNED AMBIGUITY

[From developer interviews & design documents]:

  • Intentional Design: Arkane Studios deliberately created The Outsider as morally ambiguous:

    • Harvey Smith described him as "neither good nor evil"
    • Designed as "a mysterious participant in the events of the world"
    • Intended to be "a catalyst for player choices rather than a moral arbiter"
    • Specifically created to avoid traditional video game binaries of good/evil
  • Narrative Function: Serves as:

    • A narrative device for player agency
    • A mirror reflecting player choices
    • A way to externalize moral questions
    • A challenge to simplistic moral frameworks

[From game review and analysis sources]:

  • Critics noted The Outsider was designed to subvert traditional "cosmic evil" tropes
  • His complex presentation deliberately challenges player expectations about supernatural entities in games

X. PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK: BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL

[From comprehensive thematic analysis]:

  • Nietzschean Perspective: The Outsider embodies a perspective "beyond good and evil":

    • Rejects absolute moral categories
    • Views human morality as constructed rather than cosmic
    • Observes with curiosity rather than judgment
    • Values interesting choices over "correct" ones
  • Existential Framework: His philosophy centers on:

    • Authentic choice in a universe without inherent meaning
    • responsibility for one's actions regardless of circumstances
    • The significance of agency and will
    • The potential for self-definition through action

[From philosophical connections in dialogue]:

  • His statement: "Everyone has choices to make, even gods" suggests even he operates within an existential framework
  • His interest in how people use power reflects philosophical questions about will and meaning in a chaotic universe

The question of whether The Outsider represents "absolute evil" ultimately reveals the sophisticated moral complexity of the Dishonored universe. While the Abbey presents a simplistic theological view of The Outsider as the embodiment of cosmic evil, this perspective is consistently undermined by the games' narrative, the character's own statements, and particularly the revelations about his origin as a victim rather than a villain.

Most evidence suggests The Outsider functions as an amoral rather than immoral entity - operating outside traditional moral frameworks rather than deliberately choosing evil. His fascination with human choice, particularly at moments of moral significance, positions him more as a cosmic observer interested in the nature of morality rather than a malevolent force seeking to corrupt it.

The complexity of his character is further revealed through the contrast between his actions and those of ostensibly "moral" human institutions like the Abbey and the Empire, whose atrocities often far exceed anything directly attributable to The Outsider himself. This raises profound questions about the nature of evil - whether it exists as an absolute cosmic force as the Abbey claims, or emerges from human choices and systems as The Outsider's perspective suggests.

Perhaps most significantly, the revelation of The Outsider's origin transforms him from potential embodiment of evil to a complex victim of it - a traumatized individual bound to cosmic forces beyond his control, whose apparent detachment and ambiguity stem from his own violated boundaries and stolen agency.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE OUTSIDER AND THE RAT PLAGUE: CATALYST, OBSERVER, OR CAUSE?

The Outsider and Paintings in the Dishonored Series

THE OUTSIDER AND THE ELITE: POWER, WEALTH, AND VOID CONNECTIONS